Triple

T20794701
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Area Risk Protection Insurance E511880 entity
Predicate lossMeasurementLevel P125404 FINISHED
Object county level LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: county level | Statement: [Area Risk Protection Insurance, lossMeasurementLevel, county level]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lossMeasurementLevel
Context triple: [Area Risk Protection Insurance, lossMeasurementLevel, county level]
  • A. measurementLevel chosen
    Indicates the degree or scale at which something is measured or quantified, such as its level, intensity, or magnitude.
  • B. lossType
    Indicates the specific category or nature of a loss associated with an entity or event.
  • C. enabledMeasurementOf
    Indicates that one entity made it possible or allowed another entity to perform or obtain a specific measurement.
  • D. lossContext
    Indicates that some relevant information, state, or conditions from an earlier point in a process or interaction are no longer available or preserved in the current context.
  • E. hasMeasurementDifficulty
    Indicates that performing a measurement on something is challenging or problematic in some way.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4cb83948190bd57bec21d78ed53 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c2abbcc8819091bb0225a0650ab6 completed April 21, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c0575b1c81908d010223fcd1213e completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:39 p.m.