Triple

T20777926
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hydra–Centaurus E511400 entity
Predicate densityContrast P66683 FINISHED
Object overdense relative to cosmic mean LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overdense relative to cosmic mean | Statement: [Hydra–Centaurus, densityContrast, overdense relative to cosmic mean]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: densityContrast
Context triple: [Hydra–Centaurus, densityContrast, overdense relative to cosmic mean]
  • A. hasDensityContrast chosen
    Indicates that one entity differs from another in material density, highlighting a contrast in how compact or dense they are.
  • B. achievesContrast
    Indicates that one entity creates or enhances a visual or conceptual difference relative to another entity.
  • C. densityComparedTo
    Indicates a comparison between the densities of two entities, specifying which is denser or how their densities relate.
  • D. textureContrast
    Indicates a relationship where two surfaces or regions differ noticeably in their tactile or visual texture qualities.
  • E. providesContrastWith
    Indicates that one entity is used to highlight differences or distinctions when compared with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4cac7a48190a715cb3d545df2b4 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c26d34bc81908bb22087d434322d completed April 21, 2026, 12:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c0550ec481908a0877fb2409d983 completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:37 p.m.