Triple
T20767271
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hackensack |
E511129
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorCommunities |
P80502
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lenape descendant communities in the United States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lenape descendant communities in the United States | Statement: [Hackensack, successorCommunities, Lenape descendant communities in the United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorCommunities Context triple: [Hackensack, successorCommunities, Lenape descendant communities in the United States]
-
A.
successorByCommunity
chosen
Indicates that one entity directly follows or replaces another within the same community or communal context.
-
B.
successorSociety
Indicates that one society follows and replaces another in time, inheriting or continuing its role, structures, or identity.
-
C.
successorSettlement
Indicates that one settlement directly follows and replaces another as its successor.
-
D.
successorParish
Indicates that one parish has formally succeeded another parish, taking over its ecclesiastical role or jurisdiction.
-
E.
successorColony
Indicates that one colony directly follows and replaces another colony as its historical or political successor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4ca01148190ac018e57e0cab46f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c24df58c8190b37398353ce4bf24 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c0550ec481908a0877fb2409d983 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:36 p.m.