Triple
T20760072
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Susan B. Anthony |
E510953
|
entity |
| Predicate | resultingAppeal |
P18643
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no appeal was taken because the fine was not enforced |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no appeal was taken because the fine was not enforced | Statement: [United States v. Susan B. Anthony, resultingAppeal, no appeal was taken because the fine was not enforced]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultingAppeal Context triple: [United States v. Susan B. Anthony, resultingAppeal, no appeal was taken because the fine was not enforced]
-
A.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
B.
hearsAppealTo
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
-
C.
centralAppeal
Indicates that something serves as the main attraction, focus, or compelling feature that draws interest or attention.
-
D.
appealBeyond
Indicates that something has significance, relevance, or attractiveness that extends beyond a specified scope, group, or context.
-
E.
appealStatus
chosen
Indicates the current state or outcome of an appeal within a review or decision process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c909ec8190b05987f1639513f6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c24751688190829f9d836abfb606 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c0509608819080cdbf47fcddfe36 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:35 p.m.