Triple
T20760060
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Susan B. Anthony |
E510953
|
entity |
| Predicate | defendantTestimony |
P4080
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Susan B. Anthony testified in her own defense |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Susan B. Anthony testified in her own defense | Statement: [United States v. Susan B. Anthony, defendantTestimony, Susan B. Anthony testified in her own defense]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Susan B. Anthony testified in her own defense Context triple: [United States v. Susan B. Anthony, defendantTestimony, Susan B. Anthony testified in her own defense]
-
A.
United States v. Susan B. Anthony
United States v. Susan B. Anthony was the landmark 1873 federal criminal case in which suffragist Susan B. Anthony was prosecuted and convicted for illegally voting, spotlighting the legal barriers to women's suffrage in the United States.
-
B.
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case addressing whether a pro-life advocacy group could challenge an Ohio law regulating false statements in political campaigns under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case
The Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case was an 1870s U.S. Supreme Court legal challenge in which suffragist Virginia Minor argued that the 14th Amendment guaranteed women the right to vote, a claim the Court ultimately rejected.
-
D.
Susan B. Anthony
chosen
Susan B. Anthony was a pioneering American social reformer and leading figure in the women’s suffrage movement who played a crucial role in the fight for women’s right to vote.
-
E.
Susan B. Anthony’s New Departure strategy
Susan B. Anthony’s New Departure strategy was a 19th-century legal and political approach arguing that women already had the right to vote under the U.S. Constitution’s existing guarantees of citizenship and privileges, and thus should be allowed to register and cast ballots without a new suffrage amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defendantTestimony Context triple: [United States v. Susan B. Anthony, defendantTestimony, Susan B. Anthony testified in her own defense]
-
A.
defendant
Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
-
B.
gaveTestimonyIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity provided formal testimony or a statement in an official proceeding, event, or context associated with another entity.
-
C.
coDefendant
Indicates that two or more parties are jointly named and involved as defendants in the same legal case or proceeding.
-
D.
viewOnTestimony
Indicates a stance or evaluation someone holds regarding the credibility, role, or use of testimony as a source of knowledge or evidence.
-
E.
hasTestimony
Indicates that an entity provides, contains, or is associated with a formal statement or account (testimony) about another entity or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c909ec8190b05987f1639513f6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c24751688190829f9d836abfb606 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c0509608819080cdbf47fcddfe36 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:35 p.m.