Triple

T20743003
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Church Going E510491 entity
Predicate speakerDescription P40912 FINISHED
Object skeptical but curious visitor LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: skeptical but curious visitor | Statement: [Church Going, speakerDescription, skeptical but curious visitor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: speakerDescription
Context triple: [Church Going, speakerDescription, skeptical but curious visitor]
  • A. speakerType
    Indicates the role or category of a participant in a communicative act (e.g., narrator, quoted speaker, system voice) within a given context.
  • B. speakerRole
    Indicates the functional role or capacity in which an entity is acting as a speaker within a communicative event.
  • C. speakerFeatures chosen
    Indicates that certain characteristics, attributes, or properties are associated with a speaker in a given context.
  • D. speakerInText
    Indicates that a given entity is the person who speaks or is quoted within a particular text or textual segment.
  • E. speaker2
    Indicates that the referenced entity serves as the second speaker or interlocutor in a communicative interaction or dialogue.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4c845e88190b4c5f3ae79291182 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c210a2c08190bd767df3188bb401 completed April 21, 2026, 12:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c0509608819080cdbf47fcddfe36 completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:33 p.m.