Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security | Statement: [William Frazee, partyIn, Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security]

Target entity: Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
Context triple: [William Frazee, partyIn, Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security]

• A. Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security chosen
  Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could not deny unemployment benefits to a worker who refused Sunday work for sincere religious reasons, even though he was not a member of an organized religion.
• B. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
  Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied strict scrutiny to a denial of unemployment benefits based on an individual’s religiously motivated refusal to perform certain work, reinforcing robust protections for free exercise of religion.
• C. Scott v. Illinois
  Scott v. Illinois is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel applies only when a defendant is actually sentenced to imprisonment, thereby limiting the broader protections suggested in Argersinger v. Hamlin.
• D. Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida
  Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state may not deny unemployment benefits to a worker who is fired for refusing, on newly adopted religious grounds, to work on her Sabbath.
• E. Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
  Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Family and Medical Leave Act as a valid exercise of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.