Triple
T20709905
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Archaeopolis |
E509006
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lazica |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lazica | Statement: [Archaeopolis, locatedIn, Lazica]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lazica Context triple: [Archaeopolis, locatedIn, Lazica]
-
A.
Lazica
chosen
Lazica was an ancient region on the eastern coast of the Black Sea, in what is now western Georgia, known historically as a Byzantine–Persian frontier kingdom.
-
B.
Dardania
Dardania was an ancient region in the central Balkans, roughly corresponding to parts of modern Kosovo and surrounding areas, known as a Roman and later Byzantine province.
-
C.
Sarmato
Sarmato is a small Italian municipality in the Emilia-Romagna region, known for its rural landscape and historic architecture.
-
D.
Duklja
Duklja was a medieval South Slavic principality in the western Balkans, roughly corresponding to parts of present-day Montenegro and northern Albania.
-
E.
Moesia
Moesia was an ancient Roman province located in the Balkans along the Danube River, encompassing parts of present-day Serbia and Bulgaria.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c40ad88190b81f77695366d328 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c1974ba08190b0e5ad529be95e4c |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:14 p.m.