Triple
T20697443
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Queen of the Morlocks |
E508692
|
entity |
| Predicate | leadershipStyleAssociatedWith |
P25067
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trial by combat |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trial by combat | Statement: [Queen of the Morlocks, leadershipStyleAssociatedWith, trial by combat]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leadershipStyleAssociatedWith Context triple: [Queen of the Morlocks, leadershipStyleAssociatedWith, trial by combat]
-
A.
hasTypeOfLeadership
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a specific style or form of leadership.
-
B.
hasDecisionMakingStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses or exhibits a particular way or pattern of making decisions.
-
C.
governingStyleAssociatedWith
Indicates a relationship where a particular governing style, method, or approach is linked or attributed to a specific entity (such as a leader, regime, or organization).
-
D.
leadershipContext
Indicates the situational or organizational setting in which leadership is exercised or expressed between entities.
-
E.
notableLeaderTrait
Indicates that the specified trait is a particularly prominent or defining characteristic of the leader in question.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c2b2a481909e31e9cb8f81ab55 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c1132178819081086e085f7b3ff8 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c044d1108190b2b5d25de23f6401 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:11 p.m.