Triple
T20690411
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SO(32) heterotic string theory |
E508535
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChiralFermions |
P141075
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [SO(32) heterotic string theory, hasChiralFermions, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChiralFermions Context triple: [SO(32) heterotic string theory, hasChiralFermions, true]
-
A.
isChiralInStandardModel
Indicates that the entity’s behavior or interaction in the Standard Model depends on its handedness (left- or right-handed), i.e., it is not invariant under parity transformation.
-
B.
hasChargeConjugation
Indicates that one entity is the charge-conjugated counterpart (particle vs. antiparticle form) of another entity.
-
C.
hasWeakIsospin
Indicates that an entity possesses a specified value of weak isospin, representing its charge under the weak nuclear interaction.
-
D.
hasChiralityComponents
Indicates that an entity’s chirality is determined by, or composed of, one or more specified chiral components.
-
E.
hasIsospin
Indicates that one particle possesses a specific isospin value or quantum number in relation to another reference or classification framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c1ed408190b72dd26b1e33f8a1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c10cb5588190acb88f2c82fc593a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c03caee881908be4dd25796a03d5 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5c3caef50819093c8159fe8d6435b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:08 p.m.