Triple
T20690400
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SO(32) heterotic string theory |
E508535
|
entity |
| Predicate | worldsheetSupersymmetry |
P141068
|
FINISHED |
| Object | N=1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: N=1 | Statement: [SO(32) heterotic string theory, worldsheetSupersymmetry, N=1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: worldsheetSupersymmetry Context triple: [SO(32) heterotic string theory, worldsheetSupersymmetry, N=1]
-
A.
associatedCosmology
Indicates that one entity is conceptually or thematically linked to a particular cosmological system, framework, or worldview.
-
B.
requiresExoticMatter
Indicates that one entity can only be realized, function, or occur if exotic matter is present or utilized.
-
C.
symmetryOf
Indicates that one entity is the symmetry counterpart or symmetric form of another entity, typically related by a specific symmetry operation or transformation.
-
D.
coversTheory
Indicates that one entity includes, addresses, or explains the theoretical concepts associated with another entity.
-
E.
reflectsTheoryOf
Indicates that one entity embodies, expresses, or is based on the theoretical framework, principles, or assumptions developed by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c1ed408190b72dd26b1e33f8a1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c10cb5588190acb88f2c82fc593a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c03caee881908be4dd25796a03d5 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5c3caef50819093c8159fe8d6435b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:08 p.m.