Triple

T20670548
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cadzow E508008 entity
Predicate historicParishOf P101108 FINISHED
Object Hamilton parish LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hamilton parish | Statement: [Cadzow, historicParishOf, Hamilton parish]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicParishOf
Context triple: [Cadzow, historicParishOf, Hamilton parish]
  • A. hasHistoricParishCharacter
    Indicates that something possesses the distinctive qualities or attributes traditionally associated with a historic parish.
  • B. isHistoricParishOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a historic parish that formerly served, or is recognized as having served, as the parish jurisdiction for another entity.
  • C. historicParliamentaryCounty
    Indicates that an entity is (or was) located within, or associated with, a historic parliamentary county as defined for electoral or administrative purposes.
  • D. hasParishHistory
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a documented historical record of a parish.
  • E. historicAdministrativeCentre
    Indicates that a place served as the main administrative or governmental center for a region or jurisdiction during a past historical period.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4c059bc81908ea762cd73ea4424 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6b5c735048190a01cb7692928d66e completed April 20, 2026, 11:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c03caee881908be4dd25796a03d5 completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:44 a.m.