Triple
T20667196
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samuel Freeman Miller |
E507922
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCase |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Loan Association v. Topeka |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Loan Association v. Topeka | Statement: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Loan Association v. Topeka]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Loan Association v. Topeka Context triple: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Loan Association v. Topeka]
-
A.
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
-
B.
Veazie Bank v. Fenno
Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
-
C.
Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
-
D.
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted federal employment discrimination protections, prompting Congress to expand and clarify those rights in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
E.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Loan Association v. Topeka Target entity description: Loan Association v. Topeka is an 1874 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited governmental power to tax for private purposes, helping to define the constitutional doctrine against using public funds for purely private benefit.
-
A.
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
-
B.
Veazie Bank v. Fenno
Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
-
C.
Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
-
D.
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted federal employment discrimination protections, prompting Congress to expand and clarify those rights in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
E.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c059bc81908ea762cd73ea4424 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6b5c39dd48190965d65537592aef6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:44 a.m.