Triple

T20667195
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Samuel Freeman Miller E507922 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Ex parte Yarbrough NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ex parte Yarbrough | Statement: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Ex parte Yarbrough]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ex parte Yarbrough
Context triple: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Ex parte Yarbrough]
  • A. Ex parte Yarbrough chosen
    Ex parte Yarbrough is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to protect African American voting rights in federal elections against private interference and violence.
  • B. Ex parte Garland
    Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
  • C. Ex parte Yerger
    Ex parte Yerger is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s ability to strip the Court of jurisdiction and affirmed the Court’s power to review certain habeas corpus decisions.
  • D. Ex parte McCardle
    Ex parte McCardle is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for affirming Congress’s power to limit the Court’s appellate jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution.
  • E. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4c059bc81908ea762cd73ea4424 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6b5c39dd48190965d65537592aef6 completed April 20, 2026, 11:24 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:44 a.m.