Triple
T20667195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samuel Freeman Miller |
E507922
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCase |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ex parte Yarbrough |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ex parte Yarbrough | Statement: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Ex parte Yarbrough]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ex parte Yarbrough Context triple: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Ex parte Yarbrough]
-
A.
Ex parte Yarbrough
chosen
Ex parte Yarbrough is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to protect African American voting rights in federal elections against private interference and violence.
-
B.
Ex parte Garland
Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
-
C.
Ex parte Yerger
Ex parte Yerger is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s ability to strip the Court of jurisdiction and affirmed the Court’s power to review certain habeas corpus decisions.
-
D.
Ex parte McCardle
Ex parte McCardle is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for affirming Congress’s power to limit the Court’s appellate jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c059bc81908ea762cd73ea4424 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6b5c39dd48190965d65537592aef6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:44 a.m.