Triple
T20657923
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IEEE 802.3by |
E507675
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesInterfaceType |
P56536
|
FINISHED |
| Object | optical Ethernet interface |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: optical Ethernet interface | Statement: [IEEE 802.3by, definesInterfaceType, optical Ethernet interface]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesInterfaceType Context triple: [IEEE 802.3by, definesInterfaceType, optical Ethernet interface]
-
A.
usesInterface
Indicates that one entity interacts with or operates another entity through a specified interface or set of interface methods.
-
B.
definesType
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the type or classification of another entity.
-
C.
extendsInterface
Indicates that one interface is defined as a subtype of another interface, inheriting its contract and adding or refining its members.
-
D.
definitionType
Indicates the specific kind or category of definition that characterizes how one entity is defined in relation to another.
-
E.
hasInterface
Indicates that one entity provides, exposes, or is connected through a defined interface to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4bf58c081908e52a4500e03ff83 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6b2eefd5c8190a71d4be690a6ae0e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c0315f5081908098707c6455e56e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:43 a.m.