Triple
T20651967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sophie Chapman |
E507516
|
entity |
| Predicate | maritalStatusWithMarkCorrigan |
P94899
|
FINISHED |
| Object | married then separated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: married then separated | Statement: [Sophie Chapman, maritalStatusWithMarkCorrigan, married then separated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maritalStatusWithMarkCorrigan Context triple: [Sophie Chapman, maritalStatusWithMarkCorrigan, married then separated]
-
A.
maritalStatusClaimed
Indicates that an entity has asserted or reported a particular marital status, regardless of whether it is verified or legally confirmed.
-
B.
marital status
Indicates the legal or social state of a person’s marriage-related relationship, such as being single, married, divorced, or widowed.
-
C.
maritalStatusInDisguise
Indicates that an entity’s true marital status is being concealed or misrepresented, typically appearing different from what it actually is.
-
D.
characterMaritalHistory
chosen
Indicates a relationship that records the sequence of a character’s past and present marital relationships, including spouses and relevant time periods.
-
E.
hasMaritalStatusAtEnd
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific marital status at the end of a given period, event, or reference time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4bf58c081908e52a4500e03ff83 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6af22d6bc8190b9d6877aba5704eb |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c0315f5081908098707c6455e56e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:43 a.m.