Triple
T20643776
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dar al-Ahd (in some juristic usages) |
E507297
|
entity |
| Predicate | isDiscussedWithin |
P57127
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sunni legal schools |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sunni legal schools | Statement: [Dar al-Ahd (in some juristic usages), isDiscussedWithin, Sunni legal schools]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isDiscussedWithin Context triple: [Dar al-Ahd (in some juristic usages), isDiscussedWithin, Sunni legal schools]
-
A.
discussedAs
Indicates that one entity is talked about, treated, or examined in terms of another entity, often as an example, case, or framing concept.
-
B.
containsDiscussionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or features a discussion, treatment, or consideration of another entity as a topic or subject.
-
C.
discussed
Indicates that one entity talked about, examined, or debated a topic, issue, or other entity with someone else.
-
D.
debatedWithin
chosen
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
-
E.
hasDiscussionSystem
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or supports a system for facilitating discussions or conversations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4be702c8190a3d2410a881d310a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6af1d0be481909e090193dcfd9cf6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c0315f5081908098707c6455e56e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:43 a.m.