Triple
T20640011
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | preserved county of Clwyd |
E507195
|
entity |
| Predicate | establishedAsPreservedCounty |
P58873
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1996 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1996 | Statement: [preserved county of Clwyd, establishedAsPreservedCounty, 1996]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishedAsPreservedCounty Context triple: [preserved county of Clwyd, establishedAsPreservedCounty, 1996]
-
A.
preservedCountyEstablished
chosen
Indicates that a county’s original establishment or founding status has been maintained or formally preserved over time.
-
B.
existedAsCountyUntil
Indicates that an entity functioned with the status or designation of a county up to a specified end date or time period.
-
C.
foundedAsCounty
Indicates that an administrative region or jurisdiction was originally established with the legal status and designation of a county.
-
D.
hasFormerCounty
Indicates that an entity was previously part of, or administered by, a particular county in the past but no longer is.
-
E.
hasPreservedCountyFunction
Indicates that an entity continues to perform or retain the official functions and responsibilities of a county authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4be702c8190a3d2410a881d310a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6ad126b6481908d4e235bd73dda2e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5a0155bd48190b3c769a12cc2c83d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.