Triple

T20638667
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 200GBASE-R PHYs E507157 entity
Predicate supportsFormFactors P83353 FINISHED
Object QSFP56 modules LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: QSFP56 modules | Statement: [200GBASE-R PHYs, supportsFormFactors, QSFP56 modules]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsFormFactors
Context triple: [200GBASE-R PHYs, supportsFormFactors, QSFP56 modules]
  • A. supportsDriveFormFactor
    Indicates that one entity is compatible with or can accommodate a specified physical form factor of a drive.
  • B. supportsFormFactorFamily chosen
    Indicates that one entity is compatible with and can operate using a specified family of physical or design form factors.
  • C. hasFormFactor
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular physical or structural form factor defined by another entity.
  • D. supportsForms
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or working with specific forms or form types associated with another entity.
  • E. supportsForm
    Indicates that one entity provides compatibility or backing for a particular form, format, or type associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4be702c8190a3d2410a881d310a completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6ad1163008190aa9df36750a952d2 completed April 20, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5a0155bd48190b3c769a12cc2c83d completed April 20, 2026, 3:40 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.