Triple
T20633631
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nathan Clifford |
E507018
|
entity |
| Predicate | participatedIn |
P149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Supreme Court decision in Legal Tender Cases |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Supreme Court decision in Legal Tender Cases | Statement: [Nathan Clifford, participatedIn, United States Supreme Court decision in Legal Tender Cases]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Supreme Court decision in Legal Tender Cases Context triple: [Nathan Clifford, participatedIn, United States Supreme Court decision in Legal Tender Cases]
-
A.
The Legal Tender Cases
chosen
The Legal Tender Cases were a series of post–Civil War U.S. Supreme Court decisions that ultimately upheld the federal government’s power to issue paper money (greenbacks) as legal tender for private debts.
-
B.
Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia
The Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) was an early and controversial ruling that allowed a citizen of one state to sue another state in federal court, prompting the swift adoption of the Eleventh Amendment to limit such suits.
-
C.
Legal Tender Act of 1862
The Legal Tender Act of 1862 was a U.S. Civil War–era law that authorized the issuance of paper money not backed by gold or silver and declared it legal tender for most debts, fundamentally reshaping the nation’s monetary system.
-
D.
Osborn v. Bank of the United States
Osborn v. Bank of the United States is an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed federal jurisdiction over cases involving federally chartered institutions and strengthened federal authority over the states.
-
E.
McCulloch v. Maryland
McCulloch v. Maryland is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over the states and upheld the implied powers of Congress under the Constitution.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4bd4a0081908d4e97a590a33fb2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6ad0d808c81908a60abd02a22ed92 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.