Triple
T20633630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nathan Clifford |
E507018
|
entity |
| Predicate | participatedIn |
P149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Supreme Court decision in Slaughter-House Cases |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Supreme Court decision in Slaughter-House Cases | Statement: [Nathan Clifford, participatedIn, United States Supreme Court decision in Slaughter-House Cases]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Supreme Court decision in Slaughter-House Cases Context triple: [Nathan Clifford, participatedIn, United States Supreme Court decision in Slaughter-House Cases]
-
A.
Slaughter-House Cases
chosen
The Slaughter-House Cases were an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, significantly limiting its protection of civil rights against state infringement.
-
B.
Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia
The Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) was an early and controversial ruling that allowed a citizen of one state to sue another state in federal court, prompting the swift adoption of the Eleventh Amendment to limit such suits.
-
C.
Taney Court
The Taney Court was the period of the U.S. Supreme Court (1836–1864) under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, noted for landmark and controversial decisions including the Dred Scott ruling.
-
D.
Insular Cases
The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
-
E.
Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4bd4a0081908d4e97a590a33fb2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6ad0d808c81908a60abd02a22ed92 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.