Triple

T20633629
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nathan Clifford E507018 entity
Predicate participatedIn P149 FINISHED
Object United States Supreme Court decision in Texas v. White — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Supreme Court decision in Texas v. White | Statement: [Nathan Clifford, participatedIn, United States Supreme Court decision in Texas v. White]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States Supreme Court decision in Texas v. White
Context triple: [Nathan Clifford, participatedIn, United States Supreme Court decision in Texas v. White]
  • A. Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia
    The Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) was an early and controversial ruling that allowed a citizen of one state to sue another state in federal court, prompting the swift adoption of the Eleventh Amendment to limit such suits.
  • B. United States v. Texas (1896)
    United States v. Texas (1896) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed a boundary dispute involving the State of Texas and the federal government over territory along what is now the Texas–Oklahoma state line.
  • C. Texas v. White chosen
    Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
  • D. Insular Cases
    The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
  • E. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
    The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4bd4a0081908d4e97a590a33fb2 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6ad0d808c81908a60abd02a22ed92 completed April 20, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.