Triple

T20633448
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Edwards v. California E507014 entity
Predicate priorHistory P3444 FINISHED
Object People v. Edwards, 35 Cal. App. 2d 673, 96 P.2d 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: People v. Edwards, 35 Cal. App. 2d 673, 96 P.2d 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939) | Statement: [Edwards v. California, priorHistory, People v. Edwards, 35 Cal. App. 2d 673, 96 P.2d 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: People v. Edwards, 35 Cal. App. 2d 673, 96 P.2d 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
Context triple: [Edwards v. California, priorHistory, People v. Edwards, 35 Cal. App. 2d 673, 96 P.2d 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)]
  • A. Edwards v. California chosen
    Edwards v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a California law restricting the bringing of indigent persons into the state, holding that such limits on interstate movement violated the Commerce Clause.
  • B. Edwards v. Balisok
    Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
  • C. United States v. California (1965)
    United States v. California (1965) is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified federal versus state authority over offshore submerged lands and resources on the Outer Continental Shelf.
  • D. Adamson v. California
    Adamson v. California is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refused to apply the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, later undermined by incorporation-era rulings.
  • E. California Appellate Reports
    California Appellate Reports is the official bound reporter series that publishes the written opinions of the California Courts of Appeal.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4bd4a0081908d4e97a590a33fb2 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6ad0d808c81908a60abd02a22ed92 completed April 20, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.