Triple
T20631440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Compaq Armada 7800 |
E506964
|
entity |
| Predicate | storageUpgradeability |
P103482
|
FINISHED |
| Object | user-replaceable hard drive |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: user-replaceable hard drive | Statement: [Compaq Armada 7800, storageUpgradeability, user-replaceable hard drive]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: storageUpgradeability Context triple: [Compaq Armada 7800, storageUpgradeability, user-replaceable hard drive]
-
A.
upgradeType
Indicates the specific kind or category of improvement or enhancement applied to an entity relative to its previous state.
-
B.
upgradeable
chosen
Indicates that an entity can be improved or enhanced to a higher version, level, or capability.
-
C.
storageOption
Indicates how or where something is stored, specifying the chosen method, medium, or configuration for its storage.
-
D.
upgradePlan
Indicates that one entity changes another entity’s plan to a higher or more advanced level.
-
E.
upgradeOf
Indicates that one entity is a newer, improved, or more advanced version of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4bd4a0081908d4e97a590a33fb2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6ad0b0508819093c62a4ceaf860ce |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5a0155bd48190b3c769a12cc2c83d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.