Triple
T20618711
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Love Serenade |
E506639
|
entity |
| Predicate | productionCompany |
P490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Australian Film Finance Corporation |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Australian Film Finance Corporation | Statement: [Love Serenade, productionCompany, Australian Film Finance Corporation]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Australian Film Finance Corporation Context triple: [Love Serenade, productionCompany, Australian Film Finance Corporation]
-
A.
Australian Film Development Corporation
The Australian Film Development Corporation was a government-funded body that played a key role in revitalizing Australia’s film industry in the 1970s by financing and promoting the Australian New Wave of cinema.
-
B.
Australian Film Commission
The Australian Film Commission was a government agency responsible for supporting and promoting the development, production, and distribution of Australian film and television.
-
C.
South Australian Film Corporation
The South Australian Film Corporation is a government-backed screen agency that supports and produces film and television projects in South Australia.
-
D.
New South Wales Film Corporation
New South Wales Film Corporation was a government-backed Australian film funding and production body that supported and financed local films and filmmakers, particularly during the 1970s and 1980s.
-
E.
Australian National Film Board
The Australian National Film Board was a government body responsible for overseeing and promoting the production and distribution of documentary and educational films in Australia.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Australian Film Finance Corporation Target entity description: The Australian Film Finance Corporation was a government-funded body that provided financial support for the production of Australian films and television programs.
-
A.
Australian Film Development Corporation
The Australian Film Development Corporation was a government-funded body that played a key role in revitalizing Australia’s film industry in the 1970s by financing and promoting the Australian New Wave of cinema.
-
B.
Australian Film Commission
The Australian Film Commission was a government agency responsible for supporting and promoting the development, production, and distribution of Australian film and television.
-
C.
South Australian Film Corporation
The South Australian Film Corporation is a government-backed screen agency that supports and produces film and television projects in South Australia.
-
D.
New South Wales Film Corporation
New South Wales Film Corporation was a government-backed Australian film funding and production body that supported and financed local films and filmmakers, particularly during the 1970s and 1980s.
-
E.
Australian National Film Board
The Australian National Film Board was a government body responsible for overseeing and promoting the production and distribution of documentary and educational films in Australia.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4bc90988190ac360aaf645efc1d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6abdf9d7c8190969247a4ae55b781 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:41 a.m.