Triple

T20618058
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Deposito de Cruce E506616 entity
Predicate iconographicallyFollows P140801 FINISHED
Object Crucifixion LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crucifixion | Statement: [Deposito de Cruce, iconographicallyFollows, Crucifixion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: iconographicallyFollows
Context triple: [Deposito de Cruce, iconographicallyFollows, Crucifixion]
  • A. iconographicForm
    Indicates the specific visual or symbolic representation that an entity takes within an image or artwork.
  • B. iconographicVariantOf
    Indicates that one representation is an alternative visual or stylistic depiction of the same subject as another representation.
  • C. iconographicPosition
    Indicates the relative placement or arrangement of elements within an image or visual composition, specifying where something appears in the iconographic layout.
  • D. iconographyFeature
    Indicates a visual element or motif that appears as a distinct feature within a work’s iconography.
  • E. iconographicVariant
    Indicates that one representation is an alternative or variant visual depiction of another within an iconographic tradition or system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4bc90988190ac360aaf645efc1d completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6abdf9d7c8190969247a4ae55b781 completed April 20, 2026, 10:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5a00c43308190b7ea58d559257e07 completed April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5a6a9f3f88190b961db9aca36f7da completed April 20, 2026, 4:08 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:41 a.m.