Triple
T20615964
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maurage |
E506566
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectToRegionalLaw |
P16807
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Walloon Region law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Walloon Region law | Statement: [Maurage, subjectToRegionalLaw, Walloon Region law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectToRegionalLaw Context triple: [Maurage, subjectToRegionalLaw, Walloon Region law]
-
A.
appliesLocalLaw
Indicates that a legal rule, decision, or authority is governed by and enforced under the laws of a specific local jurisdiction.
-
B.
legalCodeAppliesTo
Indicates that a particular legal code or statute is applicable to, or governs, a specified subject, situation, or entity.
-
C.
existsInJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates that an entity is located within, falls under, or is subject to the authority of a particular legal or administrative jurisdiction.
-
D.
stateLawAppliesFrom
Indicates that a particular state law becomes applicable starting from a specified point in time or under certain conditions.
-
E.
legalJurisdiction
Indicates the legal authority or geographic area whose laws and courts have the power to govern, regulate, or adjudicate matters involving the related entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4bc90988190ac360aaf645efc1d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6aadbb3ac81908145f57fd6a94256 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5a00c43308190b7ea58d559257e07 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:41 a.m.