Triple
T20600857
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | L.A.M.F. Records |
E506174
|
entity |
| Predicate | namedAfterWorkType |
P86785
|
FINISHED |
| Object | studio album |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: studio album | Statement: [L.A.M.F. Records, namedAfterWorkType, studio album]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: namedAfterWorkType Context triple: [L.A.M.F. Records, namedAfterWorkType, studio album]
-
A.
namedForWork
Indicates that one entity is named in honor of, or derived from the title of, a particular work (such as a book, film, artwork, or other creative production).
-
B.
namedForWorkOn
Indicates that an entity is named in honor of another entity specifically because of that entity’s work or contributions in a particular field or endeavor.
-
C.
workAfter
Indicates that one entity performs its work or begins an activity only after another specified entity has completed or started its own work.
-
D.
associatedWorkType
chosen
Indicates the type or category of work with which an entity is associated (e.g., publication, artwork, performance).
-
E.
typeOfWork
Indicates the kind or category of work associated with or performed by an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4ba6ae88190af871e1f9522c704 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6aa1ffd088190adeacb9fe4907530 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e59fffe1748190825e4eaa90340631 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:41 a.m.