Triple
T20576341
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IEEE P1281 |
E505226
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | optical disc file system standard |
C5536
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: optical disc file system standard Context triple: [IEEE P1281, instanceOf, optical disc file system standard]
-
A.
optical disc file system
chosen
An optical disc file system is a method of organizing and managing data stored on optical media (such as CDs, DVDs, and Blu-ray discs) so that operating systems can locate, read, and sometimes write files and directories.
-
B.
optical disc format
An optical disc format is a standardized specification that defines how digital data is physically encoded, organized, stored, and read on optical media such as CDs, DVDs, or Blu-ray discs.
-
C.
computer file system standard
A computer file system standard is a defined set of rules and structures that governs how data is named, organized, stored, accessed, and managed on storage devices across compatible systems.
-
D.
FAT file system
A FAT file system is a simple, widely supported disk file system that organizes and manages files using a File Allocation Table to track the location and allocation status of data clusters on storage media.
-
E.
FAT file system variant
A FAT file system variant is a specific implementation or extension of the File Allocation Table architecture that defines how data is organized, stored, and managed on storage media, often differing in cluster size limits, maximum volume and file sizes, and supported features.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b721588190993ac7b0a9be2736 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:39 a.m.