Triple
T20567996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitutional Court of Indonesia |
E505012
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalReviewOf |
P53035
|
FINISHED |
| Object | laws against the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: laws against the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia | Statement: [Constitutional Court of Indonesia, constitutionalReviewOf, laws against the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalReviewOf Context triple: [Constitutional Court of Indonesia, constitutionalReviewOf, laws against the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia]
-
A.
hasConstitutionalReview
chosen
Indicates that an authority or body has the power to examine and judge the conformity of laws or actions with a constitution.
-
B.
constitutionalEffect
Indicates the impact or consequence that something has on a constitution or constitutional order.
-
C.
constitutionalNumber
Indicates that an entity has a specific number or count defined or constrained by a constitution or foundational governing document.
-
D.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
E.
constitutionalRuling
Indicates a formal judicial decision determining whether a law, policy, or government action complies with a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b6587c8190aee63dc7cff244ea |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6a7a3fdc08190a34dcf4c4e51f078 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e59ff0116c8190a163ff28ed01430a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:39 a.m.