Triple
T20567936
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | judicial branch of Indonesia |
E505011
|
entity |
| Predicate | isHeadedBy |
P981
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia | Statement: [judicial branch of Indonesia, isHeadedBy, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia Context triple: [judicial branch of Indonesia, isHeadedBy, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia]
-
A.
Chief Justice of the Philippines
The Chief Justice of the Philippines is the highest-ranking judicial officer in the country, presiding over the Supreme Court and serving as the head of the Philippine judiciary.
-
B.
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Korea
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Korea is the head of the nation’s highest judicial body and oversees the administration of the court system and judiciary.
-
C.
Chief Justice of Bangladesh
The Chief Justice of Bangladesh is the head of the country's judiciary and Supreme Court, overseeing the administration of justice and serving as the highest-ranking judicial authority.
-
D.
Chief Justice of Afghanistan
The Chief Justice of Afghanistan is the highest-ranking judicial official in the country, overseeing the Supreme Court and the administration of justice nationwide.
-
E.
President of the Supreme Administrative Court
The President of the Supreme Administrative Court is the head of Poland’s highest court for administrative law, overseeing its judicial work and representing it within the country’s legal and constitutional framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia Target entity description: The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia is the highest-ranking judicial officer in the country, overseeing the national court system and leading the Supreme Court’s administration and jurisprudence.
-
A.
Chief Justice of the Philippines
The Chief Justice of the Philippines is the highest-ranking judicial officer in the country, presiding over the Supreme Court and serving as the head of the Philippine judiciary.
-
B.
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Korea
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Korea is the head of the nation’s highest judicial body and oversees the administration of the court system and judiciary.
-
C.
Chief Justice of Bangladesh
The Chief Justice of Bangladesh is the head of the country's judiciary and Supreme Court, overseeing the administration of justice and serving as the highest-ranking judicial authority.
-
D.
Chief Justice of Afghanistan
The Chief Justice of Afghanistan is the highest-ranking judicial official in the country, overseeing the Supreme Court and the administration of justice nationwide.
-
E.
President of the Supreme Administrative Court
The President of the Supreme Administrative Court is the head of Poland’s highest court for administrative law, overseeing its judicial work and representing it within the country’s legal and constitutional framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b6587c8190aee63dc7cff244ea |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6a7a3fdc08190a34dcf4c4e51f078 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:39 a.m.