Triple

T20555306
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Trans-Canada Highway near Revelstoke E504704 entity
Predicate hasSafetyConcerns P103393 FINISHED
Object winter driving conditions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: winter driving conditions | Statement: [Trans-Canada Highway near Revelstoke, hasSafetyConcerns, winter driving conditions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSafetyConcerns
Context triple: [Trans-Canada Highway near Revelstoke, hasSafetyConcerns, winter driving conditions]
  • A. raisedConcernAbout
    Indicates that one entity has expressed worry, doubt, or objection regarding another entity or issue.
  • B. safetyIssueHighlighted chosen
    Indicates that a particular safety concern or hazard has been identified and explicitly brought to attention.
  • C. hasSecurityConsideration
    Indicates that there is a relevant security-related issue, risk, or precaution associated with the referenced entity.
  • D. observationSafety
    Indicates that an observation or monitoring activity is conducted in a manner that ensures the safety of the subjects, observers, and environment involved.
  • E. hasSafetyInformation
    Indicates that one entity provides or is associated with safety-related details, warnings, or guidelines about another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b52c048190952b4d0f430813a3 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6a5dd02588190abddfcb868259a38 completed April 20, 2026, 10:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e59fe5592c8190bb6122b784496d02 completed April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:38 a.m.