Triple
T20554440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harpagon |
E504678
|
entity |
| Predicate | conflictWith |
P4897
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Élise |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Élise | Statement: [Harpagon, conflictWith, Élise]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Élise Context triple: [Harpagon, conflictWith, Élise]
-
A.
Élise
chosen
Élise is a central female character in Molière’s comedy "L’Avare," known as Harpagon’s daughter who struggles between filial duty and her love for Valère.
-
B.
Elise Rainier
Elise Rainier is a gifted psychic and paranormal investigator central to the Insidious horror film series, known for confronting malevolent supernatural entities.
-
C.
Estelle
Estelle is a British singer, rapper, and songwriter best known for her hit single "American Boy" featuring Kanye West.
-
D.
Estelle
Estelle is a community located within Jefferson Parish in the Greater New Orleans metropolitan area of Louisiana.
-
E.
Estelle
Estelle was an American civil liberties advocate best known for her role in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Griswold v. Connecticut, which established a constitutional right to marital privacy.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b52c048190952b4d0f430813a3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6a5dbe96c8190a278dfefdb4a5c43 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:38 a.m.