Triple

T20552084
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tsilhqot’in Nation E504619 entity
Predicate hasLegalCase P3010 FINISHED
Object Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia | Statement: [Tsilhqot’in Nation, hasLegalCase, Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia
Context triple: [Tsilhqot’in Nation, hasLegalCase, Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia]
  • A. Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia chosen
    Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia is a landmark 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision that for the first time recognized Aboriginal title to a specific tract of land, affirming the Tsilhqot'in people's land rights and significantly shaping Indigenous land claims law in Canada.
  • B. Heiltsuk Nation v. British Columbia
    Heiltsuk Nation v. British Columbia is a Canadian court case in which the Heiltsuk First Nation challenged provincial authority and asserted their Aboriginal rights and title over traditional territories and marine resources on the Pacific coast.
  • C. Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
    Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
  • D. Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada
    Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that clarified the nature and scope of the Crown’s fiduciary duty and obligations toward Indigenous peoples in the context of reserve lands.
  • E. Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations)
    Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations) is a landmark 2017 Supreme Court of Canada decision addressing Indigenous religious freedom and consultation duties in the context of a proposed ski resort development on traditional Ktunaxa territory.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b52c048190952b4d0f430813a3 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6a5d98c348190ac516bc2df59d878 completed April 20, 2026, 10:16 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:38 a.m.