Triple
T20532628
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roberts Court |
E504106
|
entity |
| Predicate | landmarkCase |
P9728
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Boumediene v. Bush |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Boumediene v. Bush | Statement: [Roberts Court, landmarkCase, Boumediene v. Bush]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Boumediene v. Bush Context triple: [Roberts Court, landmarkCase, Boumediene v. Bush]
-
A.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that held American citizens designated as enemy combatants have the right to challenge their detention before a neutral decision-maker.
-
B.
U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush
chosen
Boumediene v. Bush is a landmark 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held foreign detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to seek habeas corpus review in federal courts.
-
C.
Gonzales v. Williams
Gonzales v. Williams was a 1904 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the citizenship status of Puerto Ricans following the island’s acquisition by the United States.
-
D.
Zivotofsky v. Clinton
Zivotofsky v. Clinton is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of the political question doctrine by allowing courts to review a dispute over the recognition of Jerusalem in U.S. passports.
-
E.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b3a6e08190ae663701f50fab8e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6a06c709881908ef0995426a58759 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:37 a.m.