Triple

T20532625
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roberts Court E504106 entity
Predicate landmarkCase P9728 FINISHED
Object Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 | Statement: [Roberts Court, landmarkCase, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
Context triple: [Roberts Court, landmarkCase, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1]
  • A. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 chosen
    Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the use of race in public school student assignment plans under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
    Zelman v. Simmons-Harris is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a school voucher program, ruling that public funds could be used for tuition at religious schools without violating the Establishment Clause.
  • C. Board of Education v. Pico
    Board of Education v. Pico is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case in which a divided Court held that public school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in them, recognizing students’ limited First Amendment right to receive information.
  • D. Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District
    The Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District is the elected governing body that sets policy, oversees budgets, and provides leadership for the Los Angeles public school system.
  • E. Board of Education of Sausalito Marin City School District
    The Board of Education of Sausalito Marin City School District is the elected governing body responsible for setting policy, overseeing administration, and guiding educational priorities for the district’s public schools in Sausalito and Marin City, California.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b3a6e08190ae663701f50fab8e completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6a06c709881908ef0995426a58759 completed April 20, 2026, 9:53 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:37 a.m.