Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Janus v. AFSCME | Statement: [Roberts Court, landmarkCase, Janus v. AFSCME]

Target entity: Janus v. AFSCME
Context triple: [Roberts Court, landmarkCase, Janus v. AFSCME]

• A. Janus v. AFSCME chosen
  Janus v. AFSCME is a landmark 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held public-sector unions cannot require nonmembers to pay agency fees, significantly weakening union funding and power.
• B. Hague v. CIO
  Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
• C. Hudgens v. NLRB
  Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
• D. National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)
  National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes) is a legal case involving collective bargaining and labor-relations issues between the union representing U.S. letter carriers and the federal postal service.
• E. Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers
  Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on partisan political activities by federal employees.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.