Triple

T20530450
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject M70 E504052 entity
Predicate similarObjects P98121 FINISHED
Object M69 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: M69 | Statement: [M70, similarObjects, M69]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: similarObjects
Context triple: [M70, similarObjects, M69]
  • A. similarItemGroup chosen
    Indicates that two or more items belong to the same group because they share similar characteristics, attributes, or functions.
  • B. moreSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity bears a greater degree of similarity to a second entity than to a third entity, according to some defined similarity measure.
  • C. similarSchemeIn
    Indicates that one entity uses a scheme or structural pattern that is similar to that used in another entity.
  • D. lessSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity is considered to share fewer similarities or a weaker resemblance with another entity compared to some reference or alternative.
  • E. materiallySimilarTo
    Indicates that two entities share substantially the same physical or material characteristics, composition, or properties, though they may not be exactly identical.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b3a6e08190ae663701f50fab8e completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6a069edf88190835a9c392c990c55 completed April 20, 2026, 9:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e59fdb7ad88190924176c32a195db3 completed April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:37 a.m.