Triple
T20509644
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | McCarran–Ferguson Act |
E503524
|
entity |
| Predicate | influencedByCourtCase |
P140370
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association | Statement: [McCarran–Ferguson Act, influencedByCourtCase, United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association Context triple: [McCarran–Ferguson Act, influencedByCourtCase, United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association]
-
A.
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association
chosen
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court case that held insurance transactions across state lines are subject to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.
-
B.
Northern Securities Co. v. United States
Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
-
C.
Durousseau v. United States
Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
-
D.
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association was an 1897 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held railroad rate-fixing agreements violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, even if the rates were reasonable.
-
E.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal income tax as unconstitutional, prompting the later adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment to authorize such taxes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: influencedByCourtCase Context triple: [McCarran–Ferguson Act, influencedByCourtCase, United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association]
-
A.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
B.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
C.
courtInfluenceUnder
Indicates that one court operates under the legal authority, jurisdiction, or influence of another, higher court.
-
D.
affectedCourt
Indicates that a particular court is impacted or influenced by a specified action, decision, or legal matter.
-
E.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b2aa788190ae9eb37c1d73b1f1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e69dc9de788190882ce471966ef2b4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e59fdb7ad88190924176c32a195db3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5a6a824748190bbe6192d73f3c613 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:36 a.m.