Triple
T20507866
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Missouri–Iowa border |
E503481
|
entity |
| Predicate | disputePeriod |
P50190
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1830s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1830s | Statement: [Missouri–Iowa border, disputePeriod, 1830s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputePeriod Context triple: [Missouri–Iowa border, disputePeriod, 1830s]
-
A.
hasDisputedPeriod
chosen
Indicates that there exists a time span associated with the subject whose occurrence, duration, or validity is contested or not mutually agreed upon.
-
B.
disputeResolvedIn
Indicates that a particular dispute has been settled or resolved within a specified location, forum, or jurisdiction.
-
C.
disputeBegan
Indicates that a conflict or disagreement between parties was initiated or came into existence at a specific point in time.
-
D.
disputeResolvedBy
Indicates that a particular dispute or conflict has been settled or resolved through the actions, decision, or intervention of a specified party or process.
-
E.
disputeStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a disagreement or conflict between parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b1e52c8190894281cf7e3283ab |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e69dc8f3c881908ed2e0257a057e73 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e59fdb7ad88190924176c32a195db3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:36 a.m.