Triple

T20453477
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Player One E501713 entity
Predicate relationshipWithSeongGiHun P140160 FINISHED
Object forms close bond LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: forms close bond | Statement: [Player One, relationshipWithSeongGiHun, forms close bond]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithSeongGiHun
Context triple: [Player One, relationshipWithSeongGiHun, forms close bond]
  • A. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • B. showsRelationshipWith
    Indicates that one entity visually or explicitly presents or demonstrates its connection or association with another entity.
  • C. hasRomanticTensionWith
    Indicates a mutual or one-sided romantic attraction or unresolved romantic interest existing between two entities.
  • D. relationshipToTheDude
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that one entity has to the individual referred to as "the Dude."
  • E. hasProtagonistRelationship
    Indicates that there exists a central, story-driving relationship involving the protagonist and another entity within a narrative.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4ac0a1c81908845d0f8a56abce8 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e68d039af08190827bf765b50515a8 completed April 20, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e57679eb40819086142df3e39c928e completed April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e58d766b408190a1d3698145fb6d30 completed April 20, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:32 a.m.