Triple
T20451880
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd |
E501671
|
entity |
| Predicate | precededBy |
P97
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lord Judge |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lord Judge | Statement: [Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, precededBy, Lord Judge]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lord Judge Context triple: [Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, precededBy, Lord Judge]
-
A.
Lord Judge
chosen
Lord Judge is a prominent British jurist who served as Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales.
-
B.
Lord Justice
Lord Justice is a senior judicial title used for appellate judges in certain UK jurisdictions, including Northern Ireland.
-
C.
Lord Casey
Lord Casey was an Australian statesman and diplomat who served as Governor-General of Australia and was influential in the nation’s mid-20th-century political and international affairs.
-
D.
Mr Justice
Mr Justice is the traditional formal title used for male judges in certain higher courts, particularly in common law jurisdictions such as England and Wales.
-
E.
Lord Hughes
Lord Hughes is a British jurist and former Justice of the UK Supreme Court known for his contributions to public and constitutional law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4ac0a1c81908845d0f8a56abce8 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e68d0296ac819081e74c67d3cc6349 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:32 a.m.