Triple
T204460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clause 40 |
E4580
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalConcept |
P10240
|
FINISHED |
| Object | access to justice |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: access to justice | Statement: [Clause 40, legalConcept, access to justice]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalConcept Context triple: [Clause 40, legalConcept, access to justice]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalContext
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
-
C.
legalSubject
Indicates that an entity is the bearer of legal rights, duties, or responsibilities within a legal relationship or context.
-
D.
legalSystem
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25737567c81908f9c505300239181 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25f46b4f081909e5ee3718109a71f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b4b42ec8190bef16bbbdd30a742 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25f4602c081909e89de233cbc5670 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:21 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.