Triple

T20445044
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sue (A Boy Named Sue) E501495 entity
Predicate learnsFromFather P140139 FINISHED
Object name was intended to make him tough LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: name was intended to make him tough | Statement: [Sue (A Boy Named Sue), learnsFromFather, name was intended to make him tough]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: learnsFromFather
Context triple: [Sue (A Boy Named Sue), learnsFromFather, name was intended to make him tough]
  • A. fatherWas
    Indicates that one entity was the male parent (father) of another entity in the past.
  • B. fatherFrom
    Indicates a parental relationship where one entity is the biological or legal father of another entity.
  • C. successorOfFather
    Indicates that one entity is the successor or heir of another entity’s father.
  • D. fatherBasedOn
    Indicates a paternal relationship inferred from indirect or derived evidence rather than directly asserted.
  • E. learnsLanguageFrom
    Indicates that one entity acquires or improves knowledge of a language through instruction, exposure, or guidance provided by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4ac0a1c81908845d0f8a56abce8 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e68cfca4788190ad57ecb504f54d11 completed April 20, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5766df0008190a73c4f613c29678f completed April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e58d766b408190a1d3698145fb6d30 completed April 20, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:32 a.m.