Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Shining Path insurgency | Statement: [History of Peru, includesTopic, Shining Path insurgency]

Target entity: Shining Path insurgency
Context triple: [History of Peru, includesTopic, Shining Path insurgency]

• A. Peruvian civil conflict (1980s–1990s) chosen
  The Peruvian civil conflict (1980s–1990s) was a brutal internal war between the Peruvian state and insurgent groups, most notably the Maoist Shining Path, that resulted in widespread human rights abuses and tens of thousands of deaths, particularly among rural and Indigenous populations.
• B. 26th of July Movement insurgency
  The 26th of July Movement insurgency was the Cuban revolutionary campaign led by Fidel Castro in the 1950s that used guerrilla warfare to overthrow the Batista dictatorship and ultimately bring the Cuban Revolution to victory.
• C. Túpac Amaru II rebellion
  The Túpac Amaru II rebellion was a major late-18th-century indigenous uprising in the Spanish Viceroyalty of Peru that challenged colonial rule and symbolized resistance against imperial oppression in the Andes.
• D. Guatemalan Civil War
  The Guatemalan Civil War was a decades-long internal armed conflict (1960–1996) marked by brutal state repression, widespread human rights abuses, and genocide against Indigenous populations, deeply shaping Guatemala’s modern political and social landscape.
• E. Nepalese Maoist movement
  The Nepalese Maoist movement is a communist insurgent and later political force in Nepal that led a decade-long civil war aiming to overthrow the monarchy and establish a people’s republic based on Maoist ideology.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.