Triple
T20425729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pozzo |
E500995
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleInRelationshipWithLucky |
P77541
|
FINISHED |
| Object | master |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: master | Statement: [Pozzo, roleInRelationshipWithLucky, master]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInRelationshipWithLucky Context triple: [Pozzo, roleInRelationshipWithLucky, master]
-
A.
roleInRelationship
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds a specific role or position within a defined relationship between two or more entities.
-
B.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
C.
worksInCloseRelationshipWith
Indicates a collaborative professional relationship in which two or more entities work together closely and interact frequently to achieve shared goals.
-
D.
relationshipToLloyd
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Lloyd.
-
E.
relationshipToBenny
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that an entity has with Benny.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4aa68fc8190b1a14c55575ef04a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67ba86ed88190bf2d4448d2abcdc7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5766df0008190a73c4f613c29678f |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:30 a.m.