Triple

T20411493
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sharks as execution method (film) E500596 entity
Predicate hasTypicalVictimRole P140041 FINISHED
Object hero LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hero | Statement: [Sharks as execution method (film), hasTypicalVictimRole, hero]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypicalVictimRole
Context triple: [Sharks as execution method (film), hasTypicalVictimRole, hero]
  • A. isVictimOf
    Indicates that one entity suffers harm, loss, or wrongdoing as a result of another entity’s actions or events.
  • B. portraysAsVictim
    Indicates that one entity represents or depicts another entity as a victim in a given context or narrative.
  • C. victimRole
    Indicates that one entity participates in an event or situation specifically in the role of the victim or harmed party.
  • D. hasMainVictim
    Indicates that an event, action, or harmful situation primarily targets or affects a specific victim as its main subject.
  • E. allegedVictimOf
    Indicates that one entity is claimed or reported to have been harmed, wronged, or victimized by another entity, without asserting that the claim is proven.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a935588190b9446a99b37ced44 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e67a3f8fdc8190b05b6c41b38f34b7 completed April 20, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5765d7cb48190adec18d6d1e3d263 completed April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e58d7481508190a87c8b88f9df9879 completed April 20, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:29 a.m.