Triple
T20408650
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Wall |
E500533
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Young Lust |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Young Lust | Statement: [The Wall, hasPart, Young Lust]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Young Lust Context triple: [The Wall, hasPart, Young Lust]
-
A.
Young Lust
chosen
"Young Lust" is a hard rock song by Pink Floyd from their 1979 concept album *The Wall*, known for its themes of sexual frustration and rock-star excess.
-
B.
Young Lust
"Young Lust" is a hard-rock song by Aerosmith, known for its driving riffs and themes of youthful desire.
-
C.
Teenage Lust
Teenage Lust is a controversial photography book by Larry Clark that documents the raw, intimate, and often disturbing lives of American teenagers.
-
D.
The Wild Youth
The Wild Youth is an EP by the American indie pop band Daughter, showcasing their atmospheric, melancholic sound and introspective songwriting.
-
E.
Flaming Youth
Flaming Youth was a short-lived 1960s British rock band best known for featuring future Genesis drummer and vocalist Phil Collins.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a935588190b9446a99b37ced44 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67a3d03ac81908f37b907ccbb5088 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:29 a.m.