Triple
T20399099
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Medicare Appeals Council |
E500284
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayRemand |
P12548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | case to an Administrative Law Judge |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: case to an Administrative Law Judge | Statement: [Medicare Appeals Council, mayRemand, case to an Administrative Law Judge]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayRemand Context triple: [Medicare Appeals Council, mayRemand, case to an Administrative Law Judge]
-
A.
canRemand
chosen
Indicates that an authority (such as a court or decision-maker) has the power to send a case or matter back to a lower body or earlier stage for further action or reconsideration.
-
B.
mayAmend
Indicates that one party has the authority or permission to modify, revise, or change something that already exists.
-
C.
mayProsecute
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
-
D.
mayGrantLeaveToAppeal
Indicates that an authority has the power or discretion to allow a party to proceed with an appeal.
-
E.
mayReject
Indicates that one entity has the authority or option to refuse, decline, or not accept another entity or proposal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a81bec8190b69adfdc1336a015 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6798cf04481909f183c4c75fe6d52 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5765d7cb48190adec18d6d1e3d263 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:29 a.m.