Triple
T20399096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Medicare Appeals Council |
E500284
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayAffirm |
P3106
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Administrative Law Judge decision |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Administrative Law Judge decision | Statement: [Medicare Appeals Council, mayAffirm, Administrative Law Judge decision]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayAffirm Context triple: [Medicare Appeals Council, mayAffirm, Administrative Law Judge decision]
-
A.
mayGrant
Indicates that one entity has the authority or permission to confer, assign, or bestow a right, privilege, or resource to another entity.
-
B.
mayAdmit
Indicates that one entity has the permission or authority to allow another entity to enter, join, or be accepted into something.
-
C.
maySign
Indicates that an entity has the permission or authority to sign a document, agreement, or similar item.
-
D.
affirms
chosen
Indicates that one entity explicitly confirms, supports, or asserts the truth or validity of another entity, statement, or proposition.
-
E.
mayReject
Indicates that one entity has the authority or option to refuse, decline, or not accept another entity or proposal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a81bec8190b69adfdc1336a015 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6798cf04481909f183c4c75fe6d52 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5765d7cb48190adec18d6d1e3d263 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:29 a.m.